Each human system has a way to integrate mobs. To set the scene we look at two different political systems and then drill deeper in view of the envisioned transformation of the mob into lifefulfilling teams:

A MOB is a small (< 144) or one-sided mass of people. One of the most challenging mob is the Swiss Government that consist of seven members who claim to be 1/7 of a premier minister and 1/7 of a head of state (thou constitutionally speaking the Swiss population is the effective head of state via its voting power). Its uniqueness is the collegiality principle which requires a majority behind each decision in any department which is headed by each of them and the obligation to then stand for that decision even if it turned out against ones own conviction. The 1999 government is presided for the first time in history by a woman, Ruth Dreifuss. If a mob produces something like the sum of the individual's contributions we speak of a group, if synergy is at work and the effect is more than the sum of its participants, we speak of a team. 

A mob usually forms by its underlying one-sidedness or as the consequence of the impact of some other bigger, or more powerful mob. Thus the mob of the Swiss citizens elect the mob of the Swiss parliamentarians which in turn elect the seven members of the collegial Swiss Government. The first process is basically content-free party politics, while a new government ministers is elected at least on a personally neutral level in view of how he or she fits into the top mob which is of course personally known to the members of parliament from working together. Thus the top mob of Switzerland represents the Swiss mobbing throughout all major factions and is forced, via the political system to act at least as a groups, if not a team, in view of the other mobs mentioned who can veto them via plebiscite or the refusal when it comes to the yearly reelection or by turning down there projects in the two chambers of parliament. This unique system usually results in a top mob with the wide variety of capabilities we have show to exist in 1999. Thus the top mob gets a chance to transform the negative aspects of mobbing towards the best interests of the people and indeed, at least financially speaking, Switzerland has been living rather well with this system that streamlines its politics.

Modeling human systems as the effective network between people in terms of what they can potentially cause, rather than being based on what they "are" in other-determined and politically correct terms of philosophy, psychology, trends and mob-based systems and religions, requires a new thinking free of any dynamic of mobbing. Knowing some basic data about a person (timeline starting content-free with the date of birth, with personally neutral, outstanding changes and personally relevant transformations) gives us the chance to identify the person's innate "peopleware" as an open-ended generative principles, OEGP (on the physical / "hardware" level to be compared with the genetic code and on the social / "software" level with the impact of a conventional biography on the "market value" of a person) by which he or she can fulfill his or her life. What this innovation means can, on the tangible and social level, be compared with the light bulb of Thomas A. Edison; it conceptually sheds light in the present darkness of a lifefulfilling awareness of others and self, the prerequisite of the policy of personal destruction that is in the headlines and in the  "ear worms" our minds. For its opponents this new approach to people is like gun powder that threatens to blow away their prejudice and established thinking catastrophes through  which they have cemented their position power. For others it is what they have already acknowledged, but were unable to express in the established concepts and got stuck at that point. This approach has been worked out since 1980 as Applied Personal Science APS® and allows to "x-ray" virtually any human systems (individuals, mobs, groups, teams, organizations, cultures) towards facilitating an understanding of how to optimize its human resources management by a quantum leap and therefore improve its lifefulfilling quality.

If this sounds to complicated for you, you might like to follow the cheer leaders of Y2K millenium simplifications and sign off.