Swiss Politics and SUSTAINABILITY

APS.gif (1061 bytes)

Constitutionally speaking, the Swiss identity is still based upon "God the Almighty". However, a more politically correct formulation is envisaged at the cost of sustainability, for who can guarantee our identify better than God? We all know where self-appointed identity and 1000 year "Reichs" lead to. The trend of the global mob certainly doesn't provide any better guarantee. But what can be done about the multi-cultural society Switzerland is now, with about 18% foreigners and 2% refugees, more and more from entirely different cultural backgrounds? Where and to what degree should collective identity overwrite personal identify? These are the basic questions politics too often side-tracks or misuses and religion fades out of being of any conceptual help and rather gets  sucked into worldly dynamics after having been softened up by philosophy...

F / ptl: Be Cp Om Ce Op Oe Pm Pe Pp Cw Cm Pw Ow Bp Bw Bm
9-Hf .AO-m/M .CH/w AK-R
ML-M 		Bu-A
Co-u		 Bl-F
KV-D		 AO-c PC-V Bu-V
KV-R		 .. . PC-A
RD-u		 AK-D
ML-w		 . . FC-u .
 
 
9-Pf-lifefulfilling sustainability Pp-p - My essence is concerned with who we personally are and what we are here for...
Bl expresses his feeling (F) about   the Swiss identity and that makes him popular despite his other issues. Switzerland's identity is grounded in getting the maximum (M) out of its own identity and thus defending it and beyond that, using it as a valuable (w) way to introduce itself. This fact is not very well represented by FC who rather excuses (u) himself with it while trying to get in the EU as fast as possible and it now seems he is going to resign before he achieves that goal. Of course this allows Bl to also attack the Swiss foreign policy in its entirety. Similarly AK defocuses (R) in order to mentally (D) work out his process, while AO needs to consider the minimal (m) requirements of protecting the Swiss identity if necessary by military force. ML has learnt to maximally (M) deregulate Europe with the Swiss claims, to be able to express our key values (w), while Bu needed to follow his intuition (A) to keep the top mob a team, while Co finds the excuse to vitalize what allows to stay on top.RD is more pragmatic and for that purpose excuses (u) herself from the issue of sustainability in one's identity. KV lets go (R) established processes in order to be able to think (D) about the necessary projects. PC needs concepts (V) so that Switzerland can sustain its intuitive creativity (A) and stay a nation willed by definite choice, which can proceed with a successful long-term investment strategy...

>