The Linguistic Trap

12c) Symbols converges to meaningless Forms

After dead end convergence and that through the spirit of the time's cannibalization, denotational language in its ?0-virtuality becomes a formal dead-end expression of the %1-political correctness. For more and more people such symbols become mere forms and have no longer any meaning of referring to any reality and the underlying §-substantiality. Take the adds, mere side-tracking forms of the target group's attention, not conveying any useful content, distorting meaning...

Semantically “in”-reactions thus dominate the essential modes of more and more people. Korzybski makes the point that in essence, beneath each language lies a ?0-c3-metaphysics which %6-projects a certain structure upon §1-existence to enable people to reengineering and %5-manipulate it towards a %1-politically correct c3-world.

Thus by acquiring a language#2 we are also conditioned to a certain c3-MOS and most people are unaware of the incredible ?0-power of common sense language.

It is fair to say that c3-MOS bearer are thus enslaved at their very innermost level of awareness, in their mind and through it in their bodies, the stage for their fears of becoming %-outcast.

	And we thus %5-manipulate the world towards our corresponding %1-correctness with %6-projections and call that economy.
	Even science#1 and scientists#1 thus get an underpinning of pre-scientific prejudices such as the “evolution myth”!

In consequence public discussions on all level become more and more frustrating and inhibit lifefulfillment.

This is in stark contrast to human §-creativity that via mathematics and physics has led to today’s technology with which now almost „anything goes“ and on the other side the unproductive, entropy increasing behavior in politics, in the media and in decision making processes in the economy up to money making with sheer deception and madness.

	Thus our language overrides more and more the appropriate structure its proper application could foster.
	Because it lacks integrity, language’s inherent primitive structure, solutions are made ineffective, as soon as they begin to transcend the language because
	it imposes its Platonian and Aristotelian concept of "as is" identity rather than allowing human beings’ lifefulfilling potential.

In short the c3-MOS mental operating system pre-trans-traps everything and everybody that c3-challenges it (mind you, what I really mean here is not just things, but the belief G1-open to G2-breakthrough such ends and generating out of lifefulfilling principles instead).

Science#1 was so creative because it focused in its way on what science#2 points to, dead objects, the only things that can be adequately described by quantity and can thus be fragmented and formed in men’s image#2. Extending it to humans is a thinking catastrophe that has lead to the known human catastrophes!

	Postmodernism, acknowledging the pain of this enslavement, promotes, like Buddhism, no identity at all, and claims that to be the gateway to reframing, while in fact is leading into nirvana, a nice way to refer to chaos and nothingness.
	Instead presumptuous scientists#2 pretend there is a paradigm shift comparable to the extension of classical mechanics to the theory of relativity and the quantum theory and seek social Darwinian support from the chaos theory;
	an utter bluff with covering shameless impotence and misunderstandings!

Modern science#1, socially distorted by science#2 cannot be better than traditional science#2 (originating around 350 BC)! And which at least inspired ideals and values and not just the emperor’s new ?0-virtual clothes!

	I hope you realize that the solution to the problem of using denotational language in science#2 requires far more than intellectual and philosophical tinkering around with language of the kind that leads to this problem and which just creates more confusion!
	It requires science#3 with the focus outlined here!

Why is science#2's definition of identity a dangerous nonsense? Because it is paradoxical and thus marks the limit of its appropriateness; how can you have a generalized identity? It has led to the Socrates’ requirement for a recognized theory not to be right, liberating or even lifefulfilling, no, it needs to allow for falsification; he earned his death for it!

His approach only makes sense and is appropriate for art and mere forms of expressions, the proper domain of science#2!

But when it comes to identity and understanding the world we live in, and the people we relate to, the resulting c3-MOS approach has the disastrous consequences we moan and groan about:

	At the bottom of all questions of identity is the question whether we came into being through a Creator in his Creation as his Creatures for whom he cares in view of their lifefulfillment, or
	whether we are simply a product of a Big Bang of detachment from anything that was there before, and a consequence of an evolution of blind chance and at this stage a social Darwinian evolution of controlling things, commanding people and communicating one's self-justification of one’s usurped position;
	an attitude which requires the pre-trans-trap to sustain itself – and that makes it self-destructive!
	Thanks to modern life science, the former C3-answer can no longer be falsified without engaging in lies.
	The later, c3-approach, can and has been falsified on so many accounts, that it must be wrong, without any proof to the opposite in sight!
	But guess what, as a science myth* it is assumed to be the guideline for further falsification* for that game can go on until everything ends up fragmented and thus in chaos with nobody to falsify and rectify anything anymore!
	That final state would then be proof that there is no Creator interested in anything, however, nobody would then be there to register the proof.
	Thus for evilness to sustain its point, everything needs to be c3-fragmented as much as possible – the recipe for quantitative growth towards chaos until the substance is cannibalized for it…

[ Up ] [ Dead End ] [ Spirit of Time ] [ Language ] [ C3-Offer ] [ Understand ] [ Challenge ] [ My Decision ] [ Australia's ]