EQUALITY: In the masses people are allowed DdRr i.e, to deregulate (openness / responsibility / Glasnost) either Hard-, Soft, or Peopleware (D=WHAT) either in freedom, personally neutral or personally (d=HOW) in order to revitalize (lifefulfillment / giving meaning / law and order / Perestroika) correspondingly with Rr according to who they are. In a norm mass consisting of 144 people corresponding to the 144 is-oepg this leads to the above 48 ways to do DdRr and 24 virtual ones where we lose our integrity. Such a mass of people is content-free and thus each way of jiggling with HSP in terms of fnp is considered equal, and are respresented by the equal size tiny red spots above. However, some ways are approached by only one out of the norm mass, others by 2,3,4,6 and 9 and thus we can illustrate that we are not equal in the mass in competing for our politically correct DdRr-position in society!

FREEDOM: The author, for example shares SnSp, his way of deregulating personally neutral software in order to make it personally relevant (in terms of life-fulfillment, conscience) with nine others. By comparison Diane, his wife, shares in the norm mass, shares PnSf with no one else, and therefore his meaning in the norm mass is 1/9 of that of hers. Even if this is my real experience, I am not prepared to accept it. I feel urged to SnSp this kind of mass mentality to restore my integrity. On the other hand Diane is tempted to use her nine fold stronger position power in the mass to defend it against "revolutionaries" like me, by using personally neutral peopleware (such as the innate language dynamics) to deregulate me in order to be free of me to revitalize the software she enjoys like reading books, chatting etc. rather than facing the dragon, PnSf the mass!

Brotherhood: Thus on this level of human mentality, where numbers prevail, there is only revolting suffering from position power, or the usurpation of it e.g. hell. It all starts with the denotational power we give words. This is instigated by nn-scribes pretending to be the benefactors of humanity. They promote personally neutral ways of deregulation and revitalization and call it "progress".   This is very convincing to the disoriented masses since it promises the simplification (such as with the free market) of the above complexity. However, there is no neutral life, and solving the problems of the complexity of life with simplifications leads to a speeding up of death, in actions of mass suicide such as through poisioning the environment, our bodies (amalgam fillings), our food (aspartam), stress, wars, genocide, man-made catastrophes etc. The bases of this evil thinking catastrophe are eastern Buddhism and western philosophy; the paths to personal nirvana (nothingness) and collective chaos. It sidetracks people from the path and the truth on and with which they were meant by their Creator to fulfill their lives personally. It is in this common purpose we are truly meant to be equal and not in the nn-nothingness of the personally neutral finality of death. That is why we, my wife Diane and me, have written a book about the "end of end-technology", that reveals the basics of emotions as an expression of being unable to cope with the truth in order to force a path that, in the best case of having an appropriate belief system, is still open for reconciliation with life-fulfillment.

Responsibility: Individuals facing this dragon either think this challenge to be too big for them and even if they started out as originals, and in the process they then end up as copies (kids get handy and their own account to learn how to consume), or they fall for the temptation to misuse their position power, or are destroyed by that of others or, they sacrifice their lives in provoking ostracizism. Thus those who have an issue form interest groups, teams, parties in the hope of getting a better performance than the masses. By the way, the mass in the above model splits up into 144 fragments; the sum of its conviction power is 49/144 of that of the highest self-aware individuals, and 49/16 of those with the lowest position power. Thus the other alternative is to hope for personal quality to prevail over collective quantities; the Christian path. But let us face it, this level with its non-lifefulfilling dimensions is like a concentration camp above the doors of which it said: Let all hope go! There is only hope on a level that gives more justice to the created substantiality of individuals. And that is why each of us is urged to deregulate the mass accordingly in order to revitalize it with his or her lifefulfillment as we are often only reminded from the pulpit after a person has died.