The Temptation in striving for an office...

In our post-modern time  it has become fashionable to argue that science is ultimately a sham, that we scientists read order into nature, not out of nature, and that the laws of physics are our laws, not nature's.  This is arrant nonsense, that does not stand any light of sense other than that it happens in clogging, clubbing and mobbing: The job of a scientist is to uncover C3-sustained laws not to c3-%6 project them they Cm-think works %-wise such as the Emperor's New Cloths!

In modern times, science#2 has restricted human mentality to the subject/object relationship managed with generalizing words, denotations. In order to sustain the corresponding materialism, the following three taboos are used to keep   science#2  closed to science#3  in order to encapsulate and instrumentalize science#1 with a corresponding c3>Cm>% philosophy . This is supposed to leave "man in the center"; a mere abstraction, in reality as a %1-fiction  everybody's way and that is why at this stage that center has become void, meaningless! Instead it is filled with " anything goes " to demonstrate the "humanness" of postmodernism; the chaos of all the opinions %6-projected  into it - a mere virtual market place in people's head.  Thus the meaning of words degenerate similarly, everyone adding his salt to the sea among others, main-streamed into the %1 by system wardens,

1. themselves personally-neutral (up to celibacy) limited to personal impotency, to be able to be limiting
2. with philosophy via theology, making use of the %-projecting power of the church and the state, in positions of power
3. cannibalizing in our post modern time with them same pattern, post-normally science#1 usurping its technology to make the +2 <%<>%6 times spirit reincarnate increasingly faster with each new gag, following the pattern, introduced via America, into the whole world by the Indian Gurus...   

Above all that works on the basis of the unproven c3-evolutionary myth; more science#1  speak against it, than for it. Not that is propagated in science#2 via the postmodern history of science . Again it speaks its non-scientific, meaninglessness partial, systemic and chaotic concepts. It is based more on opinionating about genuine achievements and is thus in contrast to the %6=projected claim to be objective and scientific.

In order to infotain itself against personal insights to transcend it, the thus c3-misguided science#2 instrumentalize the Pre-Trans-Trap   with the following three taboos, which stem from the emotional cycle of assumptionsness:

The Story Telling Taboo is guiding people's emotional T=attention towards %1-political correctness  in view of maintaining their vocation, budgets, career and position power. Everything that is not relevant in those terms is not not to be told, is to be privately dealt with, is banned from the public theater and should be sublimated and suppressed in self and others. At the time of Freud, even sex was in this categories with the well-know consequences. It is thus a taboo to tell people how who really come to an insight, such as the famous dream that told the Nobel Prize winner Kekonen, what the structure of benzol is, which opened the door for a whole new range material technology and organic chemistry. If you want to be acceptable for a university position, such things have to be told in such a way, that t he impression is %6-projected that the whole path was entirely c3>Cm>%-rational with no C3-reference - the Bible is taboo in history! Since Prof. P. Huntington, eminent historian, Director for Strategic Studies at the Harvard University, it is %1-politcall correct, to write history in view of the trend, e.g. a best-seller.  At the time the Nazis did the same, it was called "disinformation". Thus your personal, though non-essential access to %1-political is to be overridden by c3>Cm>% dynamic of the   +2 <%1>%6 spirit of time!   

The Metaphor Taboo  makes it non-scientific to draw conclusions of analogy beyond a factually secured topic in science. Having for instanced realized that in thermodynamics, closed systems assume the state of the greatest disorder, this should not become a pretext to state the same about c3>Km>% closed mental systems and specific organizations, even if everything speaks for it or as Gorbatschov put it, "who comes too late, is punished by life". This taboo is to contain people's A=Anger over the lacking drawing of conclusions about obvious insights, such as that we should reduce, say our CO 2  outlet beneath what is sustainable. This taboo is ignoring the fact, that certain global experiments can only be performed once and it inhibits to characterize humans other than in their associations to respected bodies such as name, job, political party etc. with no higher responsibility left to the invisible Cm>% hand of the market...

The Ego Taboo forbids it at the loss of your reputation, to make any ethical, mortal, political or even religious claims on the use of your insights, ideas, inventions, discoveries, theories and philosophies. The Catholic Church required 500 years to cope with Galileo Galilee’s claim on the basis of his observations that the Earth is a sphere. His conclusion was contrary to the moral standards of his time, which was set up just to safe a system that distorted its past, in favor of its future at all cost in a non-sequiteur - a non-logical conclusion. This way it has time and again reincarnated even in view of its recognized inadequacy in terms of lifefulfillment. This leaves G=guilt a private matter and thus personal growth socially irrelevant...

These taboos reduce human life to a mentality of
1. You can't get ahead since you cannot tell your story truthful enough to set you free to get ahead
2. You can't break even with the collective since it will not integrate your insights and apply your teaching
3. You can't quit the game, since it is next to impossible to not be part of some collective

even
1. if there is a better way
2. and Yes, YOU can do, cope with the truth experienced and fulfill your life
3. and if your friends say they are all for it...

The 2nd law of thermodynamics says that after doing real work the cosmos must be more disordered than when it started: In order to build a building you've got to build a pile of waste at least as big, worse, the pile can never be as least as big, it must always be
bigger.

Unless you open your MOS=mental operating system up to the Creator and §0-fulfill your life by §1-identifying closed man-made systems to §2-deregulate them and become part of §3-revitalizing those affected by them to do §2-likewise. For whenever we impose our content-free *3=ego,   our +2/-4 desires  and %6-project our c3-Cm>%1 political correctness to intellectually %5-manipulate C3 we find out it is not sustainable and fail...

But what do we hear instead from scientists#2? They, not physicists, scientists#1 claim and demand a radical reformulation of the most fundamental aspects of social reality towards post-normal "anything goes that c3>Cm>% goes"! The fruit of this mental revolution, the now dominating c3-MOS in most people's heads, is now plucked by, guess who, "Eve", philosophers and theologians! The focus is no longer C3-lifefulfillment, but a sociological and psychological place in the c3-Big Bang evolutionary universe...

The old question of whether the details of a theory are right or wrong is suppressed, for the underlying assumption IS WRONG and so are all its conclusions! What matters now, is the degree of %-consensus a theory can achieve...

J.B.S. Haldane said: "A wise men regulates his conduct by the theories of religion and science". What he really meant was science#2 and its dependant science#1. They represent the %1=politically correct human thought; personally- neutral and in the end, content-free, thus suppressing lifefulfillment which is personal, which of course must give rise to growing cults of unreason! And guess who warns most of them, scientist#2, who fear nothing but their esoteric completions which they evoked, soccer's apprentices!

For that reason the vast majority of people turns away from science#1 and leave their MOS to the thus dominating science#2 %1-"common sense", yet regarding it with awe and suspicion. People are thus left meaningless and without orientation about how to fulfill their lives. This kind of scientism has two faces, that of social and technological progress up to globalization and the misery of the non coped with restrisks, pollution, misery, drudgery, gadgetry, wasting time, weapons of mass destruction and masses of people with seriously degraded life quality up to collective.

Science#2, disguised as religious zeal have all to frequently been channeled into violent conflicts, perverting humanity for the solution of which science#2 set out. The most dreadful examples of unspeakable horrors  were instigated in the still dominating habit forming  European and American c3-MOS way of life. Guess what, the most barbarous century is %6=projected as the most progressive and most people have internalized that hoax. Popper demonstrated it to be footnote of Plato's curse on humanity...

So whatever the intention of all of Plato's disciples and all their footnotes, the resulting bloodstained history of personally-neutral conflicts in the name of some c3-abstract religious or worldly ideals provides ample proof that no universal standard can ever be reached that way! When scientist#2 blame it on the Bible and God in their distorted view of it, their c3-evil intention to suppress any C3-reference becomes obvious. At least for those who know that they are not

So what is in fact a bankruptcy of science#2 is now presented by itself in a last attempt a blackart, at the end of politics, as a failure of the Bible according to the same scheme the Pharisees used against Jesus Christ. Guess what happens when the mainstream science#2 thus crucifies science#3: it will resurrect despite all the sanctioned prejudice and all the pre-trans-traps that waste most people's lifefulfillment.

Central to the success of science#1 was the willingness of scientist#1 to abandon a theory if tangible evidence is produced against it in view of a theory that does justice to what we know and the new facts. Although individual scientists, such as those who opposed Einstein's theory of relativity irrationally in their Salieri-like jealousy towards Mozart, cling tenaciously to their prejudice in their mutual admiration societies, the scientific community is prepared to adopt a new approach - if there is a market for it. In case of Einstein, it was the atom-bomb...

In contrast, science#2 is founded on authority, religiously presented as revelation and received wisdom that claims an unalterable truth. Today that of the free market and democracy as the highest content-free and personally- neutral authorities that is believed to filter the truth and refine the process of collective endeavors. Never mind the Challenger Disaster, never mind corruption and manipulation.

It has now become %1=politically correct to be derisory about the truth that alone sets you free and throw out the baby, genuinely revealed truth, consciously worked out, integrating proven knowledge, thus giving its application meaning and sustainability, with the bath water of their discussions and call it a positive evil. While in fact a truth  is just a challenge to %1-mobbing and clubbing! So the aim of the remaining game is to refrain from "I know...I understand..., I claim..." and keep the three taboos of science (mentioned above) under all circumstances. Pretending to be equal, not unique, on a path to blend with the %1-collective is "in"! And indeed, who seems to do that best, gets elected, as did George W. Bush as US-President 2001.

Since the %1-truth has now become c3>Cm>%, almost any opinion can become "TRUE", which means people become increasingly coerced to believe firmly and "honestly, with good intentions" in untrue assumptions, claims and promises. The spirit of the times expects more than anything else humility and tolerance for what is certainly untrue - its fake existence depends on it and the devil feeds on it...

back to the TOP Synthesis