Parameterization

In view of all those who have argued with me about that topic of their highest office at some depths with me and the fact that I do not know with what results came out of it for them I would like to point out that in the meantime, not least to the work of George W. Bush, who did a truly outstanding job of working out the communication about his presidency in an exemplary way, made me approach the topic mentioned. It is that of YOUR highest OFFICE, lifefulfillment.

Please allow me to make some preliminary remarks about the language most people so far refused to cope with other than arguing to reduce it to what they are used to. Let me ask you what you have achieved with it other than %,$ and frustration at your cost and that of others, with may-be a minor benefit? That is what I begin with some  

Preliminary Remarks

Language of the kind used here in the context of science#3, Applied Personal Science APS®  is basically applied as a means to point to what the senders considers personally worthwhile pointing to the receiver's attention for his or her otherwise freely conscientiously scientific consideration.

It is never to be treated or judged as a *3=egocentric  end in itself, such as a mere energy to +2=please , to influence, to -4=hurt  or as a display of some kind of %1=political correctness, %5=manipulating and/or %6=projecting it to evoke the seeming support of an abstract or a mere virtual mass of other people. It is NOT intended or used as a mere end in its own 0?=formalism , a mere abstraction of the %-prevailing  Cm=communication multiplied be it for reasons of aesthetics (poetry),  %5,%6-rhetoric  or mere +2-entertainment, or for -4-coercing others.

I call all these existing other ways of using language blackart. This is not to say, that they are entirely evil, but their appropriateness is not the topic here. It has been dealt with by others, sufficiently with a result that does not indicate it is worthwhile pursuing! In general it just produces misunderstandings, seductions, meaningless time wasting, arguments, wars, destructions, rape, cannibalizations etc. where some seem to profit in short-term at the far greater cost for others, based on NOTHING but sumptuousness: Mere nice-sounding simplifications and whatever is falsely communicated up to lies, creates problems, and not just in driving cars, a crash which might at best reveal the truth that alone can set you free...

So I hope you have now noticed that I walk the talk. I am using commonly used symbols (characters, numbers, special symbols) consistently in terms of content and its meaning. That means that for me   personal-neutral, denotational meaning has least priority when it just conveys a %1=politically correct  emphasis. This is to say that we are going to touch contents and meanings that are preceding what is "in", such as the content-free underlying dynamics of it, matters of course, in mathematics the axioms, in physics, the laws of nature, and here the laws of lifefulfillment and its cornerstones. This is a preconditions for the main purpose, providing the orientation knowledge to assume the highest office on Earth, lifefulfillment. And this needs to convey what transcends the trend and its personally-neutral mainstream.

At this place a warning is appropriate: "Common sense" protects the trend with the pre-trans trap; the mob treats people who touch pre-topic like criminals and those who treat trans-topic likewise as an even greater danger to its ?0=formal idols, values and system.  This is the main cause of all evil, the problem for the solution it presents itself; the inhibition of inadequate orientation knowledge in favor of the dominance of the collective over the individual. Though it is a mere abstract, it usually survives all of us and thus assumes a monopoly to use coercion against whoever is not serving it in its ?0-terms by all means up to the destruction of all life on earth. In fact it is because its system wardens refuse to §-understand  in preference of their usurped %-power . Ask yourself, what § have you understood about your lifefulfillment and which is operational?

Please understand the advantage of using %1=... ; you may search for %1= and find all reference to the respective cornerstone like concepts rather than freaking out over them when they simply appear to you as not politically correct, mere mental stumbling blocks. The you react like the Pope confronted with the Reformation. Did you know that information is a surprise and that kind of fearful papal (pretending to be responsible before God for %1) reaction simply impotence as an information worker or subtly trying to make others do the work as a maggot in the bacon.

Our corner stones depicted as X=… are unavoidable to explain the parameterization of

This is to say, lifefulfillment cannot be described in any %1=politically correct way  whatsoever, and certainly not in any way you know. So stop wasting your time with such thinking catastrophes that have wasted too many lives over the centuries! So whenever you freak out over appearing as a stumbling block or the "fancy colors"; be assured that it has it's meaning that was worked out since 1980 and not at the spur of an opinion in view of pleasing some mob. Also be assured, that it will all be explained in due time. Remember, the purpose is to do justice to "YOUR highest office", lifefulfillment and not to +2=please you by entertaining you or by acknowledging your prejudice about your *3=egocentric  self or your %1=politically correct  belonging to any mob with its associated %5=manipulative  and %6=projective  power. I am sure you are better at that…

So when in doubt I suggest the following remedies in the following order:

In a next step we shall systematically explain the mentioned corner stones and the meaning of the colors use. At this stage it is enough if you have acquired a feeling what the trans-trap is and the urgency to overcome it as the main thinking catastrophe that breeds human catastrophes. Also think about how I have used the vector character of language; pointing to a reality or a substantiality just as x in mathematics or here, my life principle and then its qualities, specifically here its states of being that allows to work out the underlying relationships with other life principles, such as yours.

You see, this communication is personally relevant to you,  treating it entirely personally-neutral such as looking for a recipe for quick fixes among others  or even content-free, e.g. as a mere surfing experience,   will just drives you into the virtual stumbling blocks of your thus unmet expectations and not sustainable prejudices; you will not find anything useful for blackart. Be warned it might reduce your capacity to use the blackart by which you have so far become "successful" in this world other than in your highest office! And by the way, that kind of disappointment is the second best that can happen to you after preventatively understanding what your highest office takes and following that path in truth towards fulfilling your life!

back to the TOP Science#2