And that is why peopleware is still based on the software of philosophy based on dealing with hardware (so that we are but subjects that manipulate objects) rather on the word of our Creator and the order of his Creation. And upon that basis, science aims at a technology to C3-re-engineer the world rather than C3-redesign it in terms of the best available understanding of the order that sustains our life in view of its fulfillment intended (by God) and most of us pay the corresponding price in the name of the politically correct system.

The good news in this c3-world is, that meanwhile, the hardware with its global workflow more and more controlled by the globalizing software (finance- and marketing systems) can now be reframed from c3- towards C3-peopleware provided a critical number of dedicated people are willing to engage in the necessary Timely Exchange of Project-Orientated Competence, TEPOC©.One of the world's greatest reframings, so far, in relation to the Euro has just been completed smoothly and we have been through the reframing of the Roman Empire, which was ignited by Jesus Christ  up to the point where the dogmatic church was reframed by Luther and hav continued up to transforming the threat of thermonuclear annihilation in the cold war into turning the whole world into a global market economy by Gorbatchev. So one would think, what now seems a comparatively small step for organized mankind would also be a small step for most people who are now forced to change faster than ever, if there  were no scribes who resist genuine progress as ever, betraying it and channeling it towards nff-materialism by glorifying dead-end technology based on the c3-simplification of C3. Imagine the announcement of a conference for their small-talk and nobody pays any attention; fulfill your life rather than outsourcing your substance made available to you by God, to a system in the futile hopeof getingt your position empowered by succumbing to it - remember Faust and the Sorcerer's Apprentice and the fact, that even the emperor ends up naked (content-free) in this world!

And contrary to nirvana-fans it it important not to mix up content-free with NOTHING and become negative, using personally neutral deception to justify that, for example by using the nice sounding slogan: "life is to overcome pain" and then personally "live" by substituting life correspondingly - the anti thesis to Jesus Christ who defined himself as the path, the truth and life (see MAT 5:20 "But I warn you - unless you obey God better than the teachers of religious law and the Pharisees do, you can't enter the Kingdom of Heaven at all! and in JOH 14:6 Jesus told them, "I am the way, the truth, and the life. No one can come to the Father except through me.)  This is a clear warning not to fall into the postmodern trap of "anything goes"; a sound basis for science and meaningful technology requires soul searching - why did all this scientific and technological development happen in Christian cultures and why does it no longer work for us...? Because, what works for the world, does not work for me personally  - aha: The basic and unavoidable choice is between dedicating one's life to a c3->C3 path or to substitute what is, C3, with c3 with the resulting pseudo identity. Be aware, the latter happens by default, unless you dedicate your life to the former - ultimately there is no muddle-ground:

"Knowledge in modern physics (and the exact sciences generally) presuppose that there is such a thing as knowledge (in the sense of belief which is both rationally warranted and correct) of values, if not of ethical values, at least of epistemic values and the further Pragmatism tenet that there is no significant difference between the justification of epistemic values and the justification of moral values. The Pragmatist strategy, unlike the strategy of the reductive materialism (miscalled "naturalism") which is so popular today, does not depend on the project of "ontology", that is of an inventory of the kinds of possible "entities", but rather on the rejection of that sort of ontic metaphysics. Instead of the metaphysically inflated notions of "objectivity" so popular in metaphysical realist circles, Pragmatism proposes modest and essentially human criteria of objectivity." (Hilary Putnam). With this ambiguous pragmatism we have learned to analyze scientific work locally and that is a threat to the universal claim of science and leads to its sidetracking into re-engineering, forgetting its more important challenge of redesigning the mind in terms of what really is and has an impact on our life-fulfillment. Thus people as personal entity can be outsourced by demeaning the full significance of their interactions with the "ear worm" dynamic of (nice-sounding and politically correct such as "four legs good, two legs bad") language in which translation stands as the governing metaphor for how terms and meaning shift. Instead of pointing to such software inadequacies, they are misused to sublimate more sustainable foundations. Instead scribes look at "conceptual schemes," and find it more appropriate to look at the specific forms of exchange languages that develop in the margins - how theorists and experiments come to work out forms of argument, denotations, and other Ce-lifeless habits. By reframing essential question this way one can ask: how can the thus man-made objects by manipulated by subjects based on their usurped position power - the scribe's game of black art to sublimate life-fulfillment by giving these mediating structures rights of their own "creation". Thus freed from anything created, anything seems to go and it becomes possible to probe the development of the ever-changing hybrids: biophysics, molecular biology, or back further in time. Just how far can such discursive nonsense of sublimating innate man-made peopleware with software in view of hardware go? Ultimately to mere symbol manipulation in virtuality reality as was so common in the age of alchemy which science has set out to overcome in the service of lifefulfillment?