| |
experience: X
> f > t >
S > a > p > I -
c3 > C3
S
! M h
t J v R
f b c y
X a p I |
After
the default *3/TAG,
the implicit +2/-4
or the explicit %-option
with its associated ?0
or the §GHL
path chosen the need to t=think
how to get away with it arises in the known and |
| published human
way. Left
to that stage, thinks-systems evolve by which priests,
ministers, teachers, intellectuals, professors, consultants,
psychologists, sociologists etc. teach and/or convince those
who have already moved further into practice but get doubts
about their appropriateness, efficiency, social compatibility,
competitiveness,
righteousness etc. Too often, without realizing, the theory
about special situations thus becomes formative
for a c3-MOS when the above
mentioned §GHL
path is not followed. Thus c3-engineers become human
resource managers and politicians and carry their mentality on
their level of incompetence, followed
by all those who are not yet at that level... |
S
! M h
t J v R
f b c y
X a p I |
Since
execution cannot be procrastinated forever, rationalization comes
to a halt and one S=defocuses
from further consideration to get on with it. |
| Similarly
people leave some to technology or
delegate it to others to justify or their position power
imply enjoy their privileges after having done some of the
work. This in turn requires further think-systems to manage
it all in an overall think-system. The danger is that the overall
think-systems, paradigms, hermeneutic,
political and cultural systems, c3-MOS
etc. suddenly become more important than the people
they are supposed to serve. The
result, stress, less and less
opportunity to relax, which then asks
for further think-systems etc., political, social and ethical
ones, until humans are entangled
in today's cancerous word wide webs of
c3-rationalizations...
In terms of my
identity, my t=thinking is H2-3Bw
and my S=defocus B2-4Cm:
I am in fact hopefully thinking about
the H2=C3-order by which it is possible to Bw=working
meaningful boundary conditions for F3=expressing
lifefulfillment. With
it I aim for a B2=breakthrough in my belief that
allows me to S=defocus from F4=managing the required
Cm=multiplication of communication about it.
|
Transformation:
[ Up ] [ Rationalization ] [ Conceptualization ] [ Fire Test ] [ Position ] [ Lifefulfillment ]
|