|
God and/or Return on Investment by
Dr. Peter Meier
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
CREATURES: When and how should I consider my inner experience in order to understand or using the know-how to manipulate the world? CREATION:
What would you do with time, if
you would get some as a present? command:
What is the point of changing people beyond
where they want to go?
control:
The handy gives everybody the right to disturb everybody else at any time
- where does that converge to? communication:
Love and Time are the
most considered topics...are they? Why not?
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| X > A New Understanding of the World | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Applied
Personal Science APS® is based on the undeniable
fact that as Creatures we need an understanding of our Creator
in order to lead an meaningful life in his Creation. If on the
other hand we seek an understanding through
philosophy we aim in fact for control.
If we ask for a philosophy to serve the purpose
of philosophy we create a closed, and thereby self defeating
c3-system at war with itself. If we ask for a philosophy to
understand say the Bible through theology,
we are at best promoting communication,
at worst produce things like the 30-year war (1618-48) that devastated
Europe. If we try to understand the world rather than Creation we strive
for control that ultimately
leads into virtual reality and the
corresponding irrelevance of biological life as is promoted by some
respected MIT-professors in Artificial Intelligence based on fear of
and ignorance about what life is about.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| f > Feel the Implication of Theology | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Therefore
theology that is not entirely in the service of helping people to change
their mentality
It is not in accordance with what Jesus Christ demanded in the Bible, just because it calls itself "Christian". Non creative, personally-neutral, e.g. philosophy based theology#2 can only have the general, hermeneutically deduced content of the Bible, God's Creation as understood in a quantitative and thus dead, content-free way by science#1 and the nature of his Creatures are described by denotationally wordy science#2 as a personally-neutral reference. Such a theology#2 can never deal in any creative, let alone lifefulfilling way with living together as the Bible calls us to do. But it did provide the basis for the way to c3-organize#2 people; a concept that is now the problem for the solution of which it presents itself! It in fact deals with what people can achieve in terms of c3 be it in reality or in virtual reality such as novels or philosophy. The latter is is basically the history of human arrogance and failure to argue independently of God in any sustainable way. The former, the so-called progress, the failure to subdue Earth in any sustainable way.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| t > Think beyond Science#2 ! | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Historically
speaking, philosophy
relates to what is to be perceived by humans through their sense or using
instruments via the thus possible c3-evolution,
e.g. ontology
rather than C3-truthfully.
Similarly human thinking about the cause of the changing of reality,
which I shall refer to as "Wirklichkeit" (substantiality)
was shaped by the philosophy's epistemoloy
and its interpreting hermeneutic rather than by personal
conscientiousness.
And
here comes the trap door; epistemology
c3-pretends
to deal with the origin, nature and limits of knowledge.
In fact it is embedded in philosophy and deals with its terms
of hermeneutic studying the corresponding contingent#2
grounds
on which people make c3-claims.
It thus pre-trans-traps the
basic C3-relationships between essential causes (Wirklichkeit)
and their impact to reality!
On consequence, by scientists#2
c3-misusing
their definition power,
in English, there is no appropriate word for what I point to with "Wirklichkeit"
and in German that word is now exclusively used as a synonym to "Realität"!
It has lead, among others to reducing physics to a chaotic reality
mapping. In short, !epistemology
is infotaining people's minds into a c3-MOS mindset | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| S > Defocus from THE Thinking-Catastrophe! | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The
fact that in languages such as English, French and Italians just to
mention the ones I know, reality and what I referred to above with the German
word "Wirklichkeit" cannot be adequately expressed, is proof
of the pre-trans-trapping
reduction of people's MOS
implemented by misleading
scientists#2!
This is a thinking catastrophe and because it leads to human
catastrophe, a
crime against humanity,
may-be the most basic and severe one! | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| a> External Facts Alone are Deceiving | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The fact, that is intuitively obvious, is that the distinction between what is referred to with "reality", which tends to virtual reality, and what I refer to with the tag "Wirklichkeit" is more fundamental than any distinction between any two things in this universe:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| p> You have Ears to Hear... | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| The Bible (MAT 24:35) is quite outspoken about the contingency
of c3-manipulated reality: "Heaven and
earth will pass away," as well as about the necessary substantiality
of "Wirklichkeit": "but my
word will never pass away." Of course "God's
word" is the prime sustainable "Wirklichkeit" in comparison
to c3-"words" spoken by men with a
hidden c3-agenda. They are mere virtual realities, sometimes just hot air
that dissipate according to thermodynamics to
the greatest disorder. Trying to command, control
and communicate within man-made
language without reference to any sustainable
"Wirklichkeit" is Hellenistic.
It is turning away from God. It is, in Christian terms "sin".
If it is, pretending to be and competing with "Wirklichkeit" say
in rhetoric, again in Christian terms "evil".
According to philosophers, you have to struggle with
philosophy. According to the Bible you have to struggle with the
devil by praying to God, in order to fulfill your
life. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| I > Conceptualization of one' Choice | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| So if Jesus Christ
was God revealing himself to mankind as a Redeemer, then according to Karl
Popper (The Enemy of the Open Society)
Plato was the devil making himself
known to humanity as the Fragmenter
and Aristotle with his sense of
identity, the Simplifier.
With his "Forms" Plato fragmented any relationship to "Wirklichkeit" in order to set the scene for "objective" denotational communication. He also reduced the Creator to an imitator of pre-created concepts for that purpose. In this exemplary way he managed to set up the minds of subjects to deal with the denotations given to them in order to structure their minds in the way he considers appropriate to command and control them via communication! His
philosophy in fact used theology as a carrier for this philosophy
by c3-suggesting hermeneutic; in
fact this is a key concept in genetical manipulation - using virus
as carriers and multipliers of manipulated genes... | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| b > Balancing c3 with C3 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Thus Plato was, via %5=mental
manipulation a %6=projector of human %1=political
correctness up to the c3-MOS
conditioning than a problem solver of any kind! For this
reason, whenever Athens c3-mixes up with
C3-Jerusalem, e.g. when Christians identify
with Plato's Forms rather than with the
C3-Revelation of the Holy Spirit in their hearts, there are man-made
problems that causes symptoms which gives rise to
suffering through sin, C3-deviation.
At this point humans are tested whether they attempt to
just displace the symptoms with non-sustainable
human c3-power or whether they endure in their suffering until they
can C3-understand
the underlying problem in terms of conflicting substantialities and can come up with a solution
based on sustainable, God-guaranteed "Wirklichkeiten" such as the laws#1
of nature (physics) or the law#3
of life-fulfillment (such as pointed to in
the Bible). | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| J > Sustainable Self-Justification | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Having achieved a sense of balancing life, it is important to know that
Thus, the c3-approach, the
wisdom of this world, is a technology to, neuronally speaking establish
the rule of the mid-brain in people's heads and that was the true purpose
Plato as a person of his time had in mind according to Popper.
He was interested in a technology to domesticate
his fellow people to re-establish the kind of c3-oligarchy
he was used to, before Athens became %-democratic.
Based on that historic fact, Popper referred to the
rest of the philosophy as a footnote of Plato and this includes
Marxism and the Nazi ideologies as well as Jung's' archetypes. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ! > c3-Impotence / C3-Sustainability | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Philosophy asks
absolute questions, but rules out sustainable
answers and instead c3-argues about that which exceeds our
power.
Applied Personal Science APS® basically asks one questions: What is required for enhancing the life-fulfillment of as many as possible? And it encourages answers to that question that are practically applicable, personally relevant and scientifically reproducible for C3-willed people. Based on this question, it is irrelevant why the
world is, as it is, the relevant question is how
it really is now and what "Wirklichkeiten" determines its future
and what options do we have to given meaning to those
relevant "Wirklichkeiten" in view of
the lifefulfillment of as many as possible! | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| c > Gaining an OEGP Profile beyond Idols | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The answer to Lifefulfillment cannot be
They have to
Applied Personal Science APS® is not a content free science#1 like natural sciences or a personally neutral science#2 like the humanities. As science#3, it deals in 1728 personally relevant open-ended generative principles, OEGP up to their corresponding neuronal set-up that allows interested humans to understand themselves and others in a C3-way. This allows growth by living one's insights to their fulfillment rather than to be interpreted by others (giving meaning to c3-opinions). Mere opinions followed up lead to dead-ends that allows no cerebrum growth just a stem-brain excitation and at best a lustfil acid production in the mid-brain; the kind of kick, most people are addicted to, seemingly the 2nd best in live short of fulfilling it. Thus people
stay c3-MOS domesticated to whoever rules the collective - just watch the mammal approach of most adds
and the media as well as the curriculum of more and more educational
institutions and the procedures in more an more governments,
which are more concerned
to avoid
mobbing to keep their power structure than to develop
their people's cerebrum; when did you use it last, when were you appreciated
for it??? | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| v > Presumptuous Values | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| We cannot know#2 God in the reality of his
essence other than what was revealed to us in the Bible. But we
can personally relate to him in the "Wirklichkeit" in the way he
relates to us through ours - which in science#3
terms is via the mental port corresponding to a=intuition.
Similarly we cannot know the reality of "Wirklichkeit" (say what makes the law of gravity impact) but only acquire certainty based on its impact say in an experiment. According to Genesis God created the Creation generously, therefore it has a beginning and is not God. The same is generally true
Thus reality mapping, e.g. something which we fully comprehend, is a sure indication that it is inadequate, e.g. at best an illustration of a present state but not of its future potential for cause and impact. An yet philosophy is supporting psychology to base itself on human opinions expressed in the closed system of the established, denotational way to think and speak. It wastes its, and thereby those people involved one, with c3-questions about what C3-is! This can only lead to thinking catastrophes
such as all the wars and say the "Challenger Disaster", which
was not an accident as it was c3-presented by the media, but an
act of outrageous mental arrogance by the NASA managers. Their
basis was a philosophy of managing by budgets rather then
scientific common sense. On similar grounds, Jesus was crucified because
he disturbed the managers of the time,
the Pharisees in their closed-system philosophy based on dead words. Philosophy, theology and Applied Personal Science APS® are therefore to be judged towards the C3-measure stick and never by their own way of self-justification or the organized opinions of some majority who all to often cries "crucify him" on Good Friday! Remember, whoever refuses to go along with the c3-hopes of Palm Sunday and keeps integrity towards a C3-mission, is pre-trans-trapped a few days later...such are the fruits of every mental activity#2 up to and even exemplary, theology#2!
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| M > Maximum - Alternative to Philosophy | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
We experience
Rather than mentally fragmenting Creation based on Plato's Forms into the assembly of forms which we call "world", the aim of this site is to integrate the three basic types of human interactions with our neuronal make-up in a corresponding c3-MOS that does justice to our personal laws of lifefulfillment as a human Creatures. Let
us look what is now c3-availabale to
fulfill our lives with. In fact this question points
to what science#2 should be all about: Making c3-things
available for lifefulfillment without presuming
it for any other hidden agenda!
The maximum we can do about that is to aim for lifefulfilling
platforms#3 in order to overcome outdated
organizations#2 with. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| y > Minimal Mental C3-Basics | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
In view of today's existing complex global systems such as the Internet, the financial system and the economy,
Such scientific consideration have to complement and where necessary overcome outdated epistemological c3-arguments. With Applied Personal Science APS® this is possible and in addition, the Bible and among others the ten commandments find their meaning in the proposed view of the world and humans. Unlike science#2, which suppresses any reference to the Bible, science#3 is accounting for what the Creator has revealed to us by making sense of it in terms of what we can understand: Remember, whoever suppresses references to the Bible, will also pre-trans-trap your creativity; such a person has c c3-MOS which is impotent to deal with C3-creaticity and thus lifefulfillment! Search for such words on the Internet to find out, who in fact deals with it and how!
And last but not least the world view promoted here has to be in terms of the possibilities we have in his c3-World, to B=setting up boundary conditions for our
activities, | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| R > Resolution | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amazing as it sounds,
In contrast to C3-jealous
c3-philosophy the solution presented her is not a
fragmenting but a
unifying approach that conscientiously
accounts for what is known to be essential
for life-fulfillment. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| h > Living Space | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
It allows humans to define themselves in
an open way (cradles). This allows a growing awareness rather than
inviting other to interpret each other with prejudices. This
overcomes a otherwise confined and confining life in closed-systems (coffins), exemplified in the New Testament by the Pharisees.
Any world view and understanding of
humans that does not contain the essential personal OEGP
quality in terms of C3 such as human
and psychological c3-descriptions merely tagging with words, cause
more fragmentation and thereby problems and pain than they are worth the effort. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
in the context of Usurpation: |
