| |
| Science#1
is presented by scientists#2 as helping
people understand the underlying §=order
of nature in order to rise above
it by using the content-free
technology it allows to control
things.
This requires a B=belief that an order to that end exists even if it is not yet know. On the other hand this requires communicating some infotainment so that scientists#1 do not think of using their results in any other way! Thus science#2 must insist on the content-free quality of science#1 so that it can instill its hidden agenda as the belief scientists#1 have to hold to get a budget and a position through them. To set a benchmark, H=hopeful expectations as to what can be achieved with the product of science#1, technology have to be set up by science#2. The purpose is to thus to keep scientists#1 under their command, say with rhetoric and ethic, all based on their denotational#2, e.g. personal-neutral language and its content-free appeal in the mass. Thus the definition power is claimed by science#2: In postmodern times it is enhanced with topics such as the history of science, after science#1 succeeded incredibly and science#2 utterly failed in all aspects other than in defending its position. But after all, the L=love of the people belongs to the masters of science#2, politicians and leaders who command generals, scientists#1 and managers with incentives to pass their power down to the mass. This state of science is of course unacceptable in terms of the life fulfillment of as many as possible and which asks for an appropriate science#3 to be presented here. Its goal is to transcend content-free meetings at tables and personally-neutral organizations with lifefulfilling platforms. CONTINUE
to understand: |
1) Applied Personal Science